Faculty180 Reviews Case Statuses and Types

Faculty180 Reviews – State of a Case

In addition to statuses, cases are either in a state of being Active or Closed.

When a case is Active, the case could be opened, but not yet forwarded to the candidate, or could be in the queue of a unit administrator or committee configured within the case workflow.

Cases are Closed when the workflow has completed.

Faculty180 Reviews – Case Statuses

Case statuses are maintained at the administrative level.  A few of the statuses describe a particular pending state, as defined below, but when a case is routing and then closes the academic year will be applied as the final status.

20XX-20XX Academic Year – This status is applied to all cases, active and closed, to signify the academic year in which the personnel action applies.

Ready to Send to Candidate – Signifies that a case has been created but has not been sent to the candidate to complete required sections.

Case Re-Opened – Signifies that a case that was previously closed has been re-opened.

On Hold – A status used to stop a case without closing it.  When a case is ready to move forward the status can be changed back to the academic year.

Test Case – Used for test cases, only.

Faculty180 Reviews – Case Types

Appointment – Not currently used

Promotion – Used for Promotion to Full cases

Reappointment – Used for Reappointment cases for Tenure Track Faculty and Subsequent Appointment for Fixed Term Faculty cases

Review – Used for Annual Evaluations

Sabbatical – Not currently used

Tenure – Used for Promotion & Tenure and Tenure Only cases

Other – Used for Faculty Senate Award applications

Note: The uses for each review type will be expanded as new processes are adopted in Faculty180 Reviews.

Faculty180 Reviews – Template Types

Every case/personnel action started in Faculty180 Reviews is generated from a pre-defined template.  The template determines which workflow steps the case should route through, the people responsible in each step, and the requirements at each step.  The types of templates configured in Faculty180 Reviews are:

Annual Evaluation – Workflow steps are defined at the unit level.

Promotion & Tenure – Workflow steps follow requirements as outlined in the ECU Faculty Manual.

Reappointment – Workflow steps follow requirements as outlined in the ECU Faculty Manual.

Post Tenure Performance Reviews – Workflow steps follow requirements as outlined in the ECU Faculty Manual and Unit Codes.

Fixed Term Subsequent Appointment Reviews – Workflow steps follow requirements as outlined in the ECU Faculty Manual and Unit Codes.

Faculty Senate Awards – Workflow steps follow the guidelines set by Faculty Senate.